Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.cedes.org/handle/123456789/4825
Título : Similarities and differences in international clinical practice guidelines for preeclampsia diagnosis and diagnostics: a scoping review
Autor : Ábalos, Edgardo 
Diaz, Virginia 
Chamillard, Monica 
Gialdini, Celina 
Portela, Anayda 
Pasquale, Julia 
Palabras clave : Preeclampsia;Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto;Consenso;Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto
Fecha de publicación : Dec-2025
Citación : Hypertens Pregnancy;2025 Dec;44(1):2532489
Resumen : [ABSTRACT]: INTRODUCTION: Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and newborn deaths. Traditionally characterized by high-blood pressure and proteinuria, organ and placental dysfunction were later proposed in some clinical practice guidelines as additional components for its definition. Variability in diagnostic criteria across international guidelines could be a barrier to harmonized and equitable care in different settings. METHODS: We reviewed current relevant clinical practice guidelines to identify similarities and differences in recommendations related to the definition and diagnosis of preeclampsia, and their supporting evidence. We also reviewed additional systematic reviews related to the diagnosis of preeclampsia. We searched different databases and websites of international and professional organizations for guidelines published or updated from 2014 to 2024. We searched databases to identify additional systematic reviews on preeclampsia diagnosis. RESULTS: Fifteen guidelines from 11 organizations were identified with 11 systematic reviews supporting evidence on the diagnosis of preeclampsia. We found 21 additional systematic reviews, not included in these guidelines. DISCUSION: There is agreement for hypertension and proteinuria for the diagnosis of preeclampsia, without a uniform consensus on methods and devices for their assessment. Organ dysfunction is considered in eight guidelines and placental dysfunction in four, with some disagreements on their usefulness, and the methods and tools for their measurement. Few guidelines support their recommendations on preeclampsia diagnosis with systematic reviews. CONCLUSION: Consensus in preeclampsia definition is needed to guide not only clinical practice but also future research and policy, particularly in global health contexts.
Descripción : Fil: Abalos E. Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad (CEDES); Buenos Aires, Argentina
Fil: Díaz V. Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales (CREP); Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
Fil: Chamillard M. Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales (CREP); Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
Fil: Gialdini C. Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales (CREP); Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
Fil: Portela A. Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland
Fil: Pasquale J. Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales (CREP); Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
URI : http://repositorio.cedes.org/handle/123456789/4825
ISSN : 1525-6065
DOI: 10.1080/10641955.2025.2532489
Appears in Collections:Artículos en publicaciones periódicas

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hypertension-pregnancy.pdfEnglish; 17 pages1,04 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

10
checked on Apr 21, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.