Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://repositorio.cedes.org/handle/123456789/4663
Título : Governance frameworks for COVID-19 research ethics review and oversight in Latin America: an exploratory study
Autor : Cabrera, Noelia 
Carracedo, Sarah 
Palmero, Ana 
Bianchini, Alahí 
Palabras clave : COVID-19;ETICA EN INVESTIGACION;AMERICA LATINA
Fecha de publicación : 6-nov-2021
Citación : Palmero A, Carracedo S, Cabrera N, Bianchini A. Governance frameworks for COVID-19 research ethics review and oversight in Latin America: an exploratory study. BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Nov 6;22(1):147. Disponible en: http://repositorio.cedes.org/handle/123456789/4663.
Resumen : Background Research has been an essential part of the COVID-19 pandemic response, including in Latin American (LA) countries. However, implementing research in emergency settings poses the challenge of producing valuable knowledge rapidly while upholding research ethical standards. Research ethics committees (RECs) therefore must conduct timely and rigorous ethics reviews and oversight of COVID-19 research. In the LA region, there is limited knowledge on how countries have responded to this need. To address this gap, the objective of our project is to explore if LA countries developed policies to streamline ethics review and oversight of research in response to the pandemic while ensuring its adherence to ethical standards, and to analyze to what extent these governance frameworks are in accordance with international guidance. Methods We conducted a descriptive and exploratory study assessing the COVID-19 research ethics governance frameworks of 19 LA countries, considering 4 dimensions based on international COVID-19 ethics guidance documents: (i) ethics review organizational model adopted, (ii) measures to coordinate between RECs and other research stakeholders, (iii) operational guidance for RECs, and (iv) key ethical issues for review and oversight of COVID-19 research. Results 10 out of 19 LA countries have some policy to streamline ethics review of COVID-19 research. Of these countries only 6 issued comprehensive documents following international guidance that contemplate strategies with recommendations for concrete actions for a timely and rigorous review. Conclusion LA countries adopted partial strategies and operational guidance that may demonstrate a lack of a comprehensive view of research ethics for the review and oversight of COVID-19 research. Continuing efforts should be directed to strengthen LA countries' research capacity to respond timely and ethically to future health emergencies. Past lessons and the ones from this pandemic should be the basis to develop international standards and operational guidelines for ethics review and oversight of any research for public health emergencies.
Descripción : Fil: Cabrera, Noelia. CEDES. Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad. Área de Salud, Economía y Sociedad; Argentina.
Fil: Carracedo, Sarah. Pontifical Catholic University of Peru; Perú.
Fil: Palmero, Ana. Directorate of Research for Health. Ministry of Health; Argentina.
Fil: Bianchini, Alahí. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho; Argentina.
Serie o Congreso: BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Nov 6;22(1):147.
URI : http://repositorio.cedes.org/handle/123456789/4663
ISSN : 1472-6939
DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00715-2
Derechos: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos en publicaciones periódicas

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
s12910-021-00715-2.pdfArticulo en inglés884,4 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro Dublin Core completo del ítem

Visitas de página(s)

491
comprobado en 30-abr-2026

Descarga(s)

54
comprobado en 30-abr-2026

Google ScholarTM

Consultar

Altmetric


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.