Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.cedes.org/handle/123456789/4531
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKohler, Racquel Een_US
dc.contributor.authorArrossi, Silvinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCurotto, Marianaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaolino, Melisaen_US
dc.contributor.authorViswanath, Kasisomayajula Vishen_US
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Antelo, Victoriaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-12T14:35:24Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-12T14:35:24Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-06-
dc.identifier.issn2561-326X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.cedes.org/handle/123456789/4531-
dc.identifier.urihttps://formative.jmir.org/2020/3/e14652/-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: SMS interventions are effective in promoting a variety of health behaviors; however, there is limited information regarding the use of SMS for cervical cancer screening and follow-up care. The Application of Communication and Information Technologies to Self-Collection study aims to evaluate a multicomponent mobile health intervention to increase triage adherence among women with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive self-collected tests in Jujuy, Argentina. Here, we describe the formative results used to design the content of the SMS to be tested in the trial. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand the cultural and contextual elements, women's beliefs, and perceptions regarding the use of SMS by the health care system and women's preferences about the message content. METHODS: We conducted five focus groups (FGs), stratified by rural or urban residence and age. All participants were aged 30 years or older and had performed HPV self-collection. Participatory techniques, including brainstorming, card-based classification, and discussions were used to debate the advantages and disadvantages of messages. We openly coded the discussions for agreements and preferences regarding the SMS content. Messages for both HPV-negative and HPV-positive women were validated through interviews with health authorities and 14 HPV-tested women. The final versions of the messages were pilot-tested. RESULTS: A total of 48 women participated in the FGs. Participants rejected receiving both negative and positive HPV results by SMS because, for them, the delivery of results should be done in a face-to-face interaction with health professionals. They stressed the importance of the SMS content informing them that results were available for pick up and reflecting the kind of relationship that they have with the community health workers and the nearest health center. Women considered that a personalized SMS was important, as was the use of a formal yet warm tone. Owing to confidentiality issues, not using the word "HPV" was also a key component of the desired SMS content; therefore, the final message included the term "self-collection" without the mention of HPV infection. Results from the validation stage and pilot test showed high acceptability of the final version of the message. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that SMS is accepted when notifying women about the availability of the HPV test result, but it should not replace the delivery of results in face-to-face, doctor-patient encounters. In addition, messages must be tailored and must have a persuasive tone to motivate women to adhere to the triage.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJMIR Form Res.;Vol 4, No 3 (2020): e14652-
dc.subjectArgentinaen_US
dc.subjectUso del Teléfono Celularen_US
dc.subjectConductas Relacionadas con la Saluden_US
dc.subjectPruebas de ADN del Papillomavirus Humanoen_US
dc.subjectTelemedicinaen_US
dc.subjectMensaje de Textoen_US
dc.subjectTriajeen_US
dc.titleDeveloping SMS Content to Promote Papanicolaou Triage Among Women Who Performed HPV Self-collection Test: Qualitative Studyen_US
dc.typeArtículoen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2196/14652-
dc.identifier.pmid32032940-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptCEDES. Centro de Estudio de Estado y Sociedad-
crisitem.author.deptÁrea de Salud, Economía y Sociedad-
crisitem.author.deptConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)-
crisitem.author.deptCEDES. Centro de Estudio de Estado y Sociedad-
crisitem.author.deptÁrea de Salud, Economía y Sociedad-
crisitem.author.deptConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)-
crisitem.author.deptCEDES. Centro de Estudio de Estado y Sociedad-
crisitem.author.deptÁrea de Salud, Economía y Sociedad-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4892-0394-
crisitem.author.parentorgCEDES. Centro de Estudio de Estado y Sociedad-
crisitem.author.parentorgCEDES. Centro de Estudio de Estado y Sociedad-
crisitem.author.parentorgCEDES. Centro de Estudio de Estado y Sociedad-
Appears in Collections:Artículos en publicaciones periódicas
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JMIRFormRes2020vol4iss3e14652p1.pdfArtículo en inglés240,87 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

233
checked on Sep 25, 2021

Download(s)

11
checked on Sep 25, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.